Slave (Ghulam) or Mamluk Dynasty
‘Mamluk’ dynasty; the word Mamluk is an Arabic word that means “slave/owned”. In
fact, three dynasties were established during this period. They were –
1. Qutbi dynasty (c. 1206 – 1211 CE) – Its founder was Qutub-ud-din Aibak.
2. First Ilbari dynasty (c. 1211- 1266 CE) – Its founder was Iltumish.
3. Second Ilbari dynasty (c. 1266 – 1290 CE) – Its founder was Balban.
Qutub-ud-din Aibak (c. 1206 – 1210 CE)
• Qutub-ud-din Aibak founded the Slave dynasty. He was a Turkish slave of
Muhammad Ghori who played an important part in the expansion of the Turkish
Sultanate in India after the Battle of Tarain. Muhammad Ghori made him the
governor of his Indian possessions. He raised a standing army and established
his hold over north India even during the lifetime of Ghori.
• After the death of Muhammad Ghori (c. 1206 CE), Tajuddin Yaldauz, the ruler of
Ghazni claimed his rule over Delhi and the governor of Multan and Uchch,
Nasiruddin Qabacha wanted independence. He also had to face many revolts
from Rajputs and other Indian rulers. However, Aibak, by displaying his mighty
power as well as other conciliatory measures, was able to win over his enemies.
He defeated Yaldauz and severed all connections with Ghazni and thus founded
the Slave dynasty as well as the Delhi Sultanate.
• Muslim writers called Aibak “Lakh Baksh” or giver of lakhs because he donated
liberally.
• He was titled “Sultan” and he made Lahore his capital.
• He also started the construction of the Qutub Minar (first storey only) after the
name of the famous Sufi saint Khwaja Qutubuddin Bakhtiyar. It was later
completed by Iltumish.
• Aibak died suddenly while playing Chaugan (horse polo) in c. 1210 CE.
Aram Shah (c. 1210 CE)
• Qutub-ud-din was succeeded by his son Aram Shah who was incapable as a ruler.
He was opposed by the Turkish armies and his rule lasted for only eight months.
Iltutmish (c. 1210 – 1236 CE)
• Iltutmish belonged to the Ilbari tribe and therefore, his dynasty was named the
Ilbari dynasty. His half brothers sold him as a slave to Aibak who made him his
son-in-law by giving his daughter to him. Later Aibak appointed him as Iqtadar of
Gwalior. In c.1211 CE, Iltutmish dethroned Aram Shah and became the Sultan
with the name of Shamsuddin. He is regarded as the real consolidator of Turkish
rule in India.
• During the first ten years of his reign, he mostly concentrated on securing his
throne from his rivals. The commanders of Muhammad Ghori like Yaldauz,
Qabacha of Multan and Ali Mardan of Bengal and Bihar rose against him.
Iltutmish defeated Yaldauz in the battle of Tarain (c. 1215 CE) and also drove
away Qabacha from Punjab.
• In c. 1220 CE, the leader of the Mongols, Temujin, popularly known as Chengiz
Khan, started his march towards Central Asia. He defeated Jalal-ud-din
Mangabarni, the ruler of Khwarizm. Mangabarni escaped from the Mongols and
sought asylum from Iltutmish. Iltutmish refused to provide him shelter in order
to save his empire from the onslaught of the Mongols. This diplomatic policy of
Iltutmish helped him to save his empire from the wrath of Chengiz Khan.
• Iltutmish brought Bengal and Bihar back into the Delhi Sultanate. He also
suppressed the Rajput revolts and recovered Ranthambore in c. 1226 CE and by
c. 1231 CE, Iltutmish established his control over Bayana, Mandor, Jalore and
Gwalior. He led an expedition against the Chalukyas of Gujarat but that remained
unsuccessful.
• Iltutmish was a great statesman. In c. 1229 CE, he received ‘mansur’, the letter of
recognition from the Abbasid Caliph by which he became the legal sovereign
ruler of India.
• He completed the construction of Qutub Minar at Delhi, the tallest stone tower in
India (238 ft).
• He also introduced the Arabic coinage in India and the silver tanka weighing 175
grams became a standard coin in medieval India. The silver tanka remained the
basis of the modern rupee.
• Iltutmish organised Turkan-i-Chahalgani, a new class of the ruling elite of forty
powerful military leaders, the Forty.
• He patronised many scholars and a number of Sufi saints came to India during
his reign. Minhaj-us-Siraj (author of Tahaqqat-i-Nasuri), Taj-ud-din, Muhammad
Junaidi, Fakhrul-Mulk-Isami, Malik Qutub-ud-din Hasan were his contemporary
scholars who added grandeur to his court.
• He nominated his daughter as his successor.
Ruknuddin Feruz Shah (c. 1236 CE)
• He was the eldest son of Iltutmish who ascended the throne with the help of
nobles. When the governor of Multan revolted, Ruknuddin Feroz Shah marched
to suppress the revolt. Using this opportunity, Iltutmish’s daughter Raziya with
the help of the Amirs of Delhi seized the throne of the Delhi Sultanate.
Raziya Sultan (c. 1236 – 1239 CE)
• Raziya Sultan was the first and only female ruler of medieval India’s Sultanate
period.
• Raziya appointed an Abyssinian slave, Malik Jamal-ud-din Yaqut as master of the
Royal horses (Amir-i-akhur). The recruitment of a few other non-Turks to
important positions aroused resentment among the Turkish nobles. Raziya
Sultan discarded the female apparel and held the court with her face uncovered
which further created resentment. She even went hunting and led the army.
• In c. 1240 CE, Altunia, the governor of Bhatinda (Sirhaind) revolted against her.
Raziya alongside Yaqut marched against Altunia, but on the way, Turkish
followers of Altunia murdered Yaqut and took Raziya prisoner. In the meantime,
the Turkish nobles put Bahram, another son of Iltutmish on the throne. However,
Raziya won over her captor, Altunia and after marrying him, proceeded to Delhi.
But she was defeated and killed on the way by Bahram Shah.
Bahram Shah (c. 1240 – 1242 CE)
• The fall of Raziya Sultan paved the way for the ascendancy of ‘the Forty’. During
the reign of Bahram Shah, there continued the struggle for supremacy between
Sultan and the nobles. The Turkish nobles supported Bahram Shah in the
beginning but later became disordered and during this unrest, Bahram Shah was
killed by his own army.
Alauddin Masud Shah (c. 1242 – 1246 CE)
• He was the son of Ruknuddin Feroz Shah and nephew of Raziya Sultan. After the
death of Bahram Shah, he was chosen as the next ruler. However, he was
incompetent and incapable of handling the affairs in the government and was
replaced by Nasiruddin Mahmud.
Nasiruddin Mahmud (c. 1246 – 1265 CE)
• He was the grandson of Iltutmish who was young and inexperienced. He had
ascended the throne with the help of Balban/Ulugh Khan, a member of
Chahalgani (the Forty) who himself assumed the position of regent. He married
his daughter to Nasirruddin and therefore, the real power lay in the hands of
Balban. Balban was powerful in the administration but he had to face the
intrigues of his rivals in the royal court. He overcame all the difficulties. In c.
1265 CE, Nasirruddin Mahmud died and according to some historians like Ibn
Batuta and Isami, Balban poisoned him and ascended the throne.
Balban (c. 1266 – 1286 CE)
• Balban’s experience as a regent made him understand the problems of the Delhi
Sultanate. He knew that the real threat to the monarchy was from the nobles
called “The Forty”. He, therefore, was sure that by enhancing the power and
authority of the monarchy, he could solve the problem.
• According to Balban, the Sultan was God’s shadow on earth, Zil-e-Ilahi and the
recipient of divine grace, Nibyabat-e- Khudai.
• Balban enhanced the power of the monarchy. He introduced rigorous court
discipline and new customs like prostration (sajida) and kissing the Sultan’s feet
(paibos) to prove his superiority over the nobles. He introduced the Persian
festival of Nauroz to impress the nobles and people with his wealth and power.
• He stood forth as the champion of Turkish nobility. He excluded non-Turks from
administration and Indian Muslims were not given important positions in the
government. To monitor the activities of the nobles he appointed spies and
developed an efficient spy system.
• Balban was determined to break the power of ‘The Forty’. He spared only the
loyal nobles and eliminated all others by fair or foul means. Malik Baqbaq, the
governor of Bedaun, was publicly flogged for his cruelty towards his servants.
Haybat Khan, the governor of Oudh was punished for killing a man who was
drunk. The governor of Bhatinda, Sher Khan was poisoned.
• Balban had to deal with internal as well as external problems. The Mongols were
looking for an opportunity to attack the Sultanate, the Indian rulers were ready
to revolt at the smallest opportunity, distant provincial governors wanted to gain
independence and the outskirts of Delhi were often plundered by the Mewatis.
To handle all these problems, he adopted a stern policy and organised a strong
central army to deal with internal issues and also to repel the Mongols.
• He established a separate military department, Diwan-e-arz and reorganised the
army. He deployed the army in different parts of his country to suppress the
rebellious elements. Balban paid more attention to restore law and order instead
of expanding his kingdom. Balban took stern action against the Mewatis and
prevented such robberies. Robbers were mercilessly pursued and sentenced to
death, as a result of which the roads became safe for travel.
• In c. 1279 CE, Tughril Khan, the governor of Bengal revolted against Balban.
Balban sent his forces to Bengal and Tughril Khan was beheaded. Balban
appointed his son Bughra Khan as the governor of Bengal.
• In the northwest, the Mongols reappeared and Balban sent his son Prince
Mahmud against them. But the prince was killed in the battle and it was a moral
blow to Balban. Balban died in c. 1287 CE. He was one of the main architects of
the Delhi Sultanate. However, he could not fully safeguard India from the Mongol
invasion.
Kaiqubad (c. 1287 – 1290 CE)
• Kaiqubad was the grandson of Balban and was made the Sultan of Delhi by the
nobles. He was soon replaced by his son, Kaimur. In c. 1290 CE, Feroz, the Ariz-e-
Mumalik (the minister of war) murdered Kaimur and captured the throne. He
took the title of Jalal-ud-din Khalji and established the Khalji dynasty.
Comments
Post a Comment